Multidimensional analysis of teaching techniques used in higher education: The case of a landscape architecture department

Ahmet Akay

doi:10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i2176

Multidimensional analysis of teaching techniques used in higher education: The case of a landscape architecture department

Authors

Ahmet Akay Short Bio Selçuk University

Ahmet Akay is currently employed at the Department of Landscape Architecture at Selçuk University. His research focuses on landscape design, walkability, urban studies, and, notably, the enhancement of visual quality in urban areas. Akay integrates innovative approaches at the intersection of urban design and environmental acoustics, aiming to elevate both the aesthetic and functional values of urban landscapes. His recent publication, "An Acoustical Landscaping Study: The Impact of Distance Between the Sound Source and Landscape Plants on Traffic Noise Reduction," examines the role of landscape configurations in mitigating urban traffic noise. Moreover, his most cited work, "Relationships between the Visual Preferences of Urban Recreation Area Users and Various Landscape Design Elements," provides a detailed analysis of the nexus between visual quality and user preferences in urban recreational spaces.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i2176

Keywords:

educational effectiveness, higher education, landscape architecture, student feedback, university

Abstract

This study provides a multidimensional analysis of teaching techniques in a landscape architecture department. The study aims to identify the most effective among different learning methods and analyze the effectiveness of the training offered by lecturers through student feedback and lecture notes. It is imperative to acknowledge the significance of student feedback as a crucial source of data for the evaluation of teaching methodologies and curriculum design. The study indicates that, beyond the extent of student learning of the course material, it is also imperative for teaching methodologies to align with the students' perceptions and personalities. To this end, a questionnaire was administered to students enrolled in four distinct courses (Computer Aided Design, Planting Design, Landscape Engineering, and Project-I) at the beginning and end of the semester. The objective of the questionnaires is to assess the students' level of knowledge regarding the topics included in the curriculum of the relevant courses. The study used a quantitative research method, a 5-point Likert-type scale, and a one-group pretest-posttest design. The data obtained were analyzed using reliability, frequency, independent, and dependent sample t-tests. In addition, the consistency between student feedback and end-of-semester course scores was also examined. The results of the study show that, in general, there is a statistically significant increase in the knowledge level of students in all courses toward the end of the semester. However, the effectiveness levels of the teaching techniques vary by course and subject. For instance, it was determined that teaching techniques were more successful in the Computer-Aided Design course (89.2% effective), while this rate was lower in the Project-I course (66.6% effective). In addition, students' perceptions of their knowledge levels (post-test results) were found to be higher than their end-of-semester scores. In the student feedback, issues such as insufficient class hours, lack of visual examples, and the importance of practical applications were also mentioned. In conclusion, the study shows that the evaluation of the questionnaire data and student scores together can be an effective tool in determining the level of teaching effectiveness and identifying issues that require revision in the curriculum.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Amua-Sekyi, E. T. (2016). Assessment, student learning and classroom practice: A review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 1-6.
Artkan, M., & Kaya M. (2021). Mimarlık eğitimini Z kuşağı ile yeniden düşünmek: Bir görsel öğrenme biçimi olarak “Bricolage”. IDA: International Design and Art Journal, 3(1), 54-69.
Charalambous, C. Y., Praetorius, A. K., Sammons, P., Walkowiak, T., Jentsch, A., & Kyriakides, L. (2021). Working more collaboratively to better understand teaching and its quality: Challenges faced and possible solutions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101092
Cheong Cheng, Y. (1994). Effectiveness of curriculum change in school: An organizational perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(3), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549410062416
Erdoğan, N. Ş., Özdoğan, M., & Korkmaz, S. Z. (2021). Review of architectural education processes applied by Turkey and member countries of the European Unions. IDA: International Design and Art Journal, 3(1), 101-116.
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882
Feng, D. (2007). School effectiveness and improvement in mainland China. In International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement (pp. 287-306): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_15
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1990). Curriculum-based measurement: A standardized, long-term goal approach to monitoring student progress. Academic Therapy, 25(5), 615-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129002500508
Heritage, M., & Heritage, J. (2013). Teacher questioning: The epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2013.793190
Khaleghimoghaddam, N. (2023). Investigating students’ challenges in learning architectural design process. IDA: International Design and Art Journal, 5(1), 87-98.
Kuhn, K.-A., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2009). Curriculum alignment: Student perception of learning achievement measures. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 351-361.
Kyriakides, L., Anthimou, M., & Panayiotou, A. (2020). Searching for the impact of teacher behavior on promoting students’ cognitive and metacognitive skills. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100810
Lanning, S. K., Wetzel, A. P., Baines, M. B., & Ellen Byrne, B. (2012). Evaluation of a revised curriculum: A four‐year qualitative study of student perceptions. Journal of Dental Education, 76(10), 1323-1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.10.tb05387.x
Law, M. Y. (2022). A Review of curriculum change and innovation for higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 10(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v10i2.5448
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2022). Student-feedback interaction model: Revised. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, Article 101208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101208
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1187
Mart, C. T. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching effectiveness in higher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 57-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i10/3358
Mortimore, P. (1993). School effectiveness and the management of effective learning and teaching. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(4), 290-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345930040404
Nicol, D., & Kushwah, L. (2024). Shifting feedback agency to students by having them write their own feedback comments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(3), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2265080
Scheerens, J., Witziers, B., & Steen, R. (2013). A meta-analysis of school effectiveness studies. Revista de Educacion. (361), 619-645. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2013-361-235
Schweinberger, K., Quesel, C., Mahler, S., & Höchli, A. (2017). Effects of feedback on process features of school quality: A longitudinal study on teachers’ reception of school inspection of Swiss compulsory schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.07.004
Shafique, F., Akram, U., & Ul Ehsan, Muhammad Kashif. (2018). Feedback mechanism role to reduce frustration for betterment of educational effectiveness: A cross-sectional research. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5(7), 6712-6720.
Steadman, M. (1998). Using classroom assessment to change both teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (75), 23-35.
Stobaugh, R., Mittelberg, J., & Huang, X. (2020). Examining K–12 students’ perceptions of student teacher effectiveness. Teacher Development, 24(2), 274-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1739740
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Tagulwa, E. A., Owino, P., Muwonge, F., & Kaahwa, M. G. (2023). The effectiveness of curriculum review in improving quality, relevance, and students’ employability in university education in Uganda. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(6), 1932-1942. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.06.19
Vasilev, Y., Vasileva, P., Batova, O., & Tsvetkova, A. (2024). Assessment of factors influencing educational effectiveness in higher educational institutions. Sustainability, 16(12), 4886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124886

Downloads

PDF

0

2

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Akay, A. (2025). Multidimensional analysis of teaching techniques used in higher education: The case of a landscape architecture department. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 6(2), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i2176