Living through dual crises: Rethinking urban resilience from lived experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i3177Keywords:
pandemic, earthquake, resilient citiesAbstract
In recent years, cities have faced increasing pressure from overlapping disasters, exposing critical weaknesses in existing spatial, institutional, and social systems. Numerous decisions made throughout the history of cities are considered in the context of reinforcing the cohesion and adaptability of institutions and communities. Resilient cities adapt to environmental, economic, and social dynamics, demonstrating their ability to withstand pressures and evolve to fulfill various roles over time. Although many crises offer valuable lessons for enhancing urban resilience, this study focuses on how the concurrence of multiple crises alters spatial configurations and usage dynamics within urban environments. The study explores how cities respond and adapt to dual crises, focusing on the intersection of seismic events and pandemic conditions. Using a qualitative, phenomenological research design, the study analyzes official disaster regulations, emergency response plans, media documentation, and in-depth interviews with individuals who experienced both an earthquake and a pandemic simultaneously. The research centers on spatial transformations and shifting urban needs in the aftermath of the October 2020 earthquake, while also reflecting on the broader implications of the February 2023 disaster. Findings highlight the complex, layered nature of urban vulnerability under concurrent crises, emphasizing the need for integrated planning approaches, adaptable public spaces, and cross-sectoral coordination. This paper contributes to the ongoing rethinking of urban resilience strategies by offering grounded insights into the lived realities of navigating dual crises.
Downloads
References
Ağralı, Ö., Sökün, H., & Karaarslan, E. (2023). Twitter data analysis: Izmir earthquake case. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies, 2(2), 36-41.
Akpolat, Y., Kaya, G., Çalışkan, A., & Karaağaç, Ş. (2021). İzmir deprem afetinden etkilenenler üzerine sosyolojik bir araştırma: Depremle ilgili toplumsal bilinci etkileyen faktörlerin analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(2), 723-753. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.841864
Aktas, Y. D., Ioannou, I., Malcioglu, F. S., Vatteri, A. P., Kontoe, M., Donmez, K., Black, J., Kazantzidou-Firtinidou, D., Dermanis, P., & Diri‐Akyildiz, F. (2022). Traditional structures in Turkey and Greece in 30 October 2020 Aegean Sea earthquake: Field observations and empirical fragility assessment. Frontiers in Built Environment, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.840159
Amirzadeh, M., Sobhaninia, S., Buckman, S. T., & Sharifi, A. (2023). Towards building resilient cities to pandemics: A review of COVID-19 literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, 104326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
Anadolu Ajansı. (2020, 5 Kasım). İzmir’de depremin yaraları sarılıyor [Fotoğraf]. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/izmirde-depremin-yaralari-sariliyor/2033410
Aru, T. (2022). The impact of the 30th October earthquake on the COVID-19 pandemic in Izmir and its vicinity [Master thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/99416
Aslan, R., & Şahinöz, S. (2023). The experiences of people with disabilities in the 2020 Izmir earthquake: A phenomenological research. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 95, 103868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103868
Banai, R. (2020). Pandemic and the planning of resilient cities and regions. Cities, 106, 102929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
BUSOS. (2020). Observation report on the Izmir-Seferihisar earthquake of October 30, 2020, with a focus on child rights (Part 1).
Büyüközkan, G., Ilıcak, Ö., & Feyzioğlu, O. (2022). A review of urban resilience literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
Chatziadam, P., Dimitriadis, A., Gikas, S., Logothetis, I., Michalodimitrakis, M., Neratzoulakis, M., Papadakis, A., Kontoulis, V., Siganos, N., Theodoropoulos, D., Vougioukalos, G., Hatzakis, I., Gerakis, G., Papadakis, N., & Kondylakis, H. (2020). TwiFly: A data analysis framework for Twitter. Information, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/info11050247
Crowley, K., Donovan, N. É. E., & Elliott, J. R. (2012). Earthquake disasters and resilience in the global North: lessons from New Zealand and Japan. The Geographical Journal, 178(3), 208-215. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23263283
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Çalışkan, A., & Kaya, G. (2021). Deprem sonrasındaki toplumsal dayanışma pratiklerinin sosyolojik görünümü: İzmir depremi örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 12(32), 1052-1077. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.878817
EEFIT. (2021). The Aegean earthquake and tsunami of October 2020. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/143006/1/Aktas%20et%20al_2021_The%20Aegean%20earthquake%20and%20tsunami%20of%2030%20October%202020.pdf
Ersoy, Ş., & Koçak, A. (2016). Disasters and earthquake preparedness of children and schools in Istanbul, Turkey. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(4), 1307-1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1060637
Flick, U. (2007). Designing qualitative research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208826
French, E. L., Birchall, S. J., Landman, K., & Brown, R. D. (2019). Designing public open space to support seismic resilience: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 34, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.001
Gök Tokgöz, Ö., & Altın, M. A. (2023). Urban design for resilient cities of the future-Lessons to be learned from the togetherness of earthquake and pandemic. In M. Birik (Ed.), 30th Urban Design and Implementations Symposium & 5th International Urban Design and Implementations Congress (pp. 85-96). Mimar Sinan Fine Art University Press.
Gök Tokgöz, Ö., Dogan Iseri, H. A., & Özcevik Bilen, A. (2023). Evaluation of the changing urban soundscape in Turkey during COVID-19 pandemic through online survey. A/Z: ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 20(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.27136
Haddaway, N. R., & Bayliss, H. R. (2015). Shades of grey: Two forms of grey literature important for reviews in conservation. Biological Conservation, 191, 827-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.018
Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., Turner McGowen, S. E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., & Griffith, S. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092
International Monetary Fund. (2020). World economic outlook: The great lockdown. https://www.imf.org/en/publications/weo/issues/2020/04/14/weo-april-2020
Inzulza-Contardo, J. (2014). Gentrification in the context of post- earthquake reconstruction urban policies: A review of the Chilean experience (Working Paper No. 9). Global Urban Research Centre.
Kitayama, S., Okada, Y., Takumi, T., Takada, S., Inagaki, Y., & Nakamura, H. (2000). Psychological and physical reactions on children after the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake disaster. The Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences, 46(5), 189-200. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11417294
Mavi, E. E. (2020). Afet kriz yönetiminde medya: 30 Ekim 2020 İzmir depremi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 31-53. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/e-kiad/828417
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Meral, A., Vural, H., & Doğan, S. (2021). What our cities can offer after natural disasters. Online Journal of Art and Design, 9(3), 250-259. http://www.adjournal.net/articles/93/9319.pdf
Mouratidis, K., & Yiannakou, A. (2021). COVID-19 and urban planning: Built environment, health, and well-being in Greek cities before and during the pandemic. Cities, 103491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103491
Osei-Kyei, R., Tam, V., Komac, U., & Ampratwum, G. (2024). Critical review of urban community resilience indicators. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(6), 1511-1537. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-08-2022-0180
Osman, T. (2021). A framework for cities and environmental resilience assessment of local governments. Cities, 118, 103372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103372
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Culture and Tourism. (2025). İzmir Provincial Directorate of Culture and Tourism. https://izmir.ktb.gov.tr/en-239196/general-information.html
Rezvani, S. M., Falcão, M. J., Komljenovic, D., & de Almeida, N. M. (2023). A systematic literature review on urban resilience enabled with asset and disaster risk management approaches and GIS-based decision support tools. Applied Sciences, 13(4), 2223. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042223
Sanderson, D., Kayden, J. S., & Leis, J. (2016). Urban disaster resilience: New dimensions from international practice in the built environment. Routledge.
Ticehurst, S., Rosemary, A., Webster, V. J., & Lewin, T. J. (1996). The psychosocıal impact of an earthquake on the elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 943-951. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199611)11:11%3C943::AID-GPS412%3E3.0.CO;2-B
TUIK. (2021). Türkiye nüfusu. https://cip.tuik.gov.tr/
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2019). Human cost of disasters 2000-2019 report.
UNESCO. (2023, June 21). Education: From COVID-19 school closures to recovery. https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-response/initiatives?hub=800
UNISDR. (2017, April 6). Turkey tackles earthquake risk. https://www.undrr.org/news/turkey-tackles-earthquake-risk
Vale, L. J. (2014). The politics of resilient cities: Whose resilience and whose city? Building Research and Information, 42(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
Walliman, N. (2017). Research methods: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315529011
Yin, H., Yang, S., & Li, J. (2020). Detecting topic and sentiment dynamics due to COVID-19 pandemic using social media. Social and Information Networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.02304
Zhu, X., & Sun, B. (2017). Study on earthquake risk reduction from the perspectives of the elderly. Safety Science, 91, 326-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.028
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mehmet Ali Altın, Özlem Gök Tokgöz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
