Analytical comparison of physical and virtual LEGO modules in architectural design education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i3181Keywords:
LEGO, architectural education, design education, educational materials, game-based educationAbstract
The educational potential of games has increasingly attracted attention within architectural pedagogy, fostering investigations into game-based learning approaches. Among these, LEGO has gained prominence in both physical and digital formats, offering unique yet complementary contributions to design education. Physical LEGO sets strengthen students’ manual dexterity, three-dimensional reasoning, and confidence by engaging them in tangible construction processes. Virtual LEGO platforms, in contrast, advance technological literacy, spatial visualization, and digital exploration, thereby preparing students for the demands of contemporary design environments. This study examines the role of both physical and virtual LEGO modules in architectural and interior design education through a comparative analysis. Student groups from different levels were tasked with reconstructing a pre-designed architectural plan using both formats. Upon completion, participants completed a structured questionnaire designed to evaluate their learning experiences, perceived challenges, and skill development. Data were analyzed using SPSS to identify statistical relationships between the two approaches. Findings revealed significant correlations between the modules, indicating their complementary nature in fostering spatial literacy and design skills. Physical LEGO modules were particularly effective in promoting hands-on engagement, efficiency, and confidence, while virtual modules enhanced creativity in digital environments and cultivated a sense of achievement. The comparison demonstrates that rather than competing, physical and digital formats enrich architectural pedagogy by addressing different dimensions of the design process. By situating LEGO within the broader discourse of game-based learning in architecture, this study underscores the importance of integrating traditional tactile methods with emerging digital tools. Such integration not only bridges the gap between physical and virtual realms but also provides a rational perspective on contemporary educational challenges in an increasingly digitized world. Ultimately, the results highlight the potential of LEGO to serve as a versatile pedagogical medium that cultivates both foundational design skills and adaptability to future technological contexts.
Downloads
References
Ashrafganjouei, M., & Nadimi, H. (2024). Exploring the impact of the direct experience of architecture precedents: A study of master student teams. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-23.
Carstens, A., & Beck, J. (2005). Get ready for the gamer generation. TechTrends, 49(3), 22-25.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coşkun, E. (2019). Temel tasarım eğitiminde bilgisayar oyunu tabanlı bir model [Unpublished master thesis]. Istanbul Technical University.
de Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2011). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 69-84.
Doma, O., & Şener, S. M. (2022). An investigation of architectural design process in physical medium and VR. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 19(3), 631-649.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20.
Güneş, C., & Tuğrul, B. (2020). LEGO destekli oyun eğitimi alan anne babaların 60-72 aylık çocuklarının oyun alışkanlıklarının incelenmesi. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 137-161.
Gürçaylılar Yenidoğan, T., & Gül, S. (2021). Digital transformation strategy: The LEGO case. Journal of Organisational Studies and Innovation, 8(3), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.51659/josi.20.139
Holubchak, K. (2020). The application of design thinking methodology in architectural education in Ukraine: Case study. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 13(4), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.21307/ACEE-2020-027
Huizenga, J. C., ten Dam, G. T. M., Voogt, J. M., & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based learning in secondary education. Computers and Education, 110, 105-115.
Jalongo, M. R., & Isenberg, J., P. (2013). Creative thinking and arts-based learning: Preschool through fourth grade (6th ed.). Pearson.
James, A. R. (2013). Lego serious play: A three-dimensional approach to learning development. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (6).
Kazez, H., & Zülfü, G. (2016). İlkokul matematik öğretiminde yeni bir yaklaşım: LEGO Moretomath. Journal of Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education, 5(2), 59-71.
LEGO. (n.d.). About LEGO digital designer. https://www.lego.com/en-us/service/help-topics/article/about-lego-digital-designer (Retrieved: 26.10.2023)
Legény, J., & Teixeira, A. G. (2019). Lego® set as a tool: Enhancing creativity in architecture. Urban Planning and Design, 4(24), 4-15.
Machado, R. S., Oliveira, I., Ferreira, I., Souto das Neves, B.-H., & Mello-Carpes, P. B. (2018). The membrane potential puzzle: A new educational game to use in physiology teaching. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 79-83.
Mohamed, E. (2017). An investigation into using digital games-based learning in architecture education. Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ), 23(3).
Petty, G. (2014). Teaching today: A practical guide (5th ed.), pp. 247. Oxford University Press.
Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me, mom, I’m learning! Paragon House.
Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. Paragon House.
Shi, Y., & Shih, J. (2015). Game factors and game-based learning design model. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 11.
Squire, K. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 1(6), 1-8.
Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2003). Harnessing the power of games in education. Insight (American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses), 3(7), 5-33.
Strand, I., & Nielsen, L. M. (2024). Architecture in school practice: Possible tools for supporting spatial literacy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-22.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
Taylor, N., & Ingraham, C. (Eds.). (2020). LEGOfied: Building blocks as media. Bloomsbury Academic.
Toraman, Ç., Çelik, Ö. C., & Çakmak, M. (2018). Oyun-tabanlı öğrenme ortamlarının akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(6), 1803-1811.
Torun, T., & Tatar, E. (2023). Mimarlık eğitiminde oyunlaştırmaya dayalı bir tasarım süreci modeli önerisi. Bodrum Journal of Art and Design, 2(1), 128-148.
Tuğrul, B. (2010). Oyun temelli öğrenme. In Okul öncesinde özel öğretim yöntemleri (pp. 187-216). Anı Publishing.
Varinlioğlu, G. (2020). Teos üzerinden dijital mirasta sanal gerçeklik uygulamalarını anlamak. Megaron, 15(1), 161-170.
Wikipedia. (2023, October 15). Lego digital designer. In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Digital_Designer (Retrieved: 26.10.2023)
Xu, H., Hui, K.-H., Fu, C.-W., & Zhang, H. (2019). Computational LEGO® technic design. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 38(6), Article 196. https://doi.org/10.1145/3355089.3356504
Yan, W. (2019). Augmented reality applied to lego construction: AR-based building instructions with high accuracy & precision and realistic object-hand occlusions (arXiv:1907.12549).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Erdem Köymen, Mhd Feda Bouidani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
