Green building certification systems: An assessment of the city of Izmir

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2026.v7i2215

Keywords:

Izmir, LEED and BREEAM certifications, green building, sustainability

Abstract

This study examines the sustainability performance of LEED and BREEAM-certified green buildings in Izmir, province of Türkiye, in terms of certification levels, assessment categories, building types and the environmental strategies implemented. Guided by a conceptual framework based on sustainability, sustainability in architecture, urban sustainability, the green building approach and international certification systems, the research aims to provide a comparative assessment at a local-scale. A qualitative research approach was adopted in the study; document analysis was used as the data collection technique. Data obtained from ÇEDBİK, USGBC, BREEAM and relevant project sources were classified according to certification type, certification level, total score, credit categories, building function and sustainability strategies; and interpreted using descriptive statistics and comparative content analysis. In this respect, the study distinguishes itself from research focusing on a single building type or a single certification category by developing a multi-typology evaluation framework based on the example of Izmir province. The findings show that there are 32 LEED-certified projects in Izmir and four BREEAM certification records associated with three separate buildings or projects. It was determined that performance in LEED-certified buildings is concentrated in the categories of energy and atmosphere, water efficiency, indoor environmental quality, location and transport, and sustainable sites; however, the materials and resources category is under-represented. BREEAM projects, on the other hand, are characterised by the operational performance of existing buildings, environmental management, energy and water conservation, waste control, user comfort and safety measures. Furthermore, it has been observed that sustainability priorities vary according to building function; different strategies are prominent in office, industrial, commercial, residential and transport buildings. The study reveals that green building practices in Izmir are spreading across different building functions; however, the publicly available records examined are insufficient to directly assess the spatial and socio-economic dimensions of this spread. Based on the findings, it is recommended that the strong practices observed in energy and water efficiency be maintained; while sustainability strategies relating to materials and resource management, the operational performance of existing buildings, and building functionality should be developed through local policies and incentives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Duygu Gökce, Suleyman Demirel University, Süleyman Demirel University

    Prof. Dr. Duygu Gökce is a faculty member in the Department of City and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture at Süleyman Demirel University. She received her Ph.D. from Dokuz Eylül University. Her primary research areas encompass climate and urban resilience, urban regeneration, disadvantaged groups (women, children, youth, the elderly, Roma communities, refugees, etc.), and urban food systems. Prof. Dr. Duygu Gökce has contributed extensively to both national and international literature in these fields and has directed research projects funded by TÜBİTAK and BAP (Scientific Research Projects). In line with her core research interests, she has supervised various completed graduate theses, with a particular focus on urban resilience.

  • Onur Tos, Tarsus University

    Onur Tos, who graduated first in his class from the Department of Public Relations and Advertising at the Faculty of Communication at Ege University in 2015, earned his master’s degree from the Institute of Social Sciences at Uşak University in 2018 with a thesis titled “The Perceived Image of Political Party Leaders in the Grand National Assembly of Turkey: A Study Focusing on State Universities in Izmir.” Tos completed his doctoral studies in the Communication Research Program within the Department of Public Relations and Advertising at the Institute of Social Sciences, Ege University, between 2019 and 2023. On March 5, 2020, at the 6th Gender Justice Congress organized by KADEM and hosted by Istanbul University, she was awarded the prize for the third-best paper presented at the congress for her paper titled “Generations X and Z’s Perception of Parenting Based on Cultural Change.” On December 22, 2020, she began working as an Instructor in the Department of Marketing and Advertising at the Tarsus University Vocational School. In February 2021, she was appointed Chair of the Department of Marketing and Advertising, a position she continues to hold. Tos continues her work in the field of communication and her interdisciplinary research.

  • Harika Tos, Suleyman Demirel University, Süleyman Demirel University

    Harika Tos graduated in 2018 from the Department of Urban and Regional Planning at the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Yozgat Bozok University. She then completed her studies in the Department of Public Administration at the Faculty of Economics, Anadolu University, and in 2021, earned her master’s degree with a 4.00/4.00 GPA from the Department of Urban and Regional Planning at the Institute of Natural Sciences, Süleyman Demirel University, with her thesis titled “From Urban Shelter to Inclusive City: Urban Refugees in Mersin (Tarsus).” During her master’s program, she served as a researcher on a scientific research project conducted on the same topic. She continues her academic work in the fields of urban and regional planning, migration, inclusive cities, sustainable urbanization, city branding, climate change, and communication. In this context, she has published scientific articles in national and international peer-reviewed journals—particularly those indexed in ESCI—as well as presented papers at international scientific conferences and contributed book chapters to academic publications. She also continues to conduct interdisciplinary research that brings together the fields of urban planning and communication.

References

Akadiri, P. O., Chinyio, E. A., & Olomolaiye, P. O. (2012). The design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the construction sector. Buildings, 2(2), 126-152. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2020126

Akşar, S. (2025). Green building certification in Turkey: An evaluation based on LEED data. Journal of Sustainable Engineering Applications and Technological Developments, 8(1), 45_60. https://doi.org/10.51764/smutgd.1668796

Akşit, Ş. F., & Baştanoğlu, E. (2021). An overview of LEED green building certification systems in Europe and Turkey. A|Z ITU Faculty of Architecture Journal, 18(1), 115_126. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2021.72473

Allen, J. G., MacNaughton, P., Laurent, J. G. C., Flanigan, S. S., Eitland, E. S., & Spengler, J. D. (2015). Green buildings and health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2(3), 250_258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0063-y

Altensis. (2026). CEVA Lojistik İzmir. Retrieved May 23, 2026, from https://www.altensis.com/proje/ceva-lojistik-izmir/

Ateş-Can, S., & Özipek, B. (2019). Sürdürülebilirlik kavramı ve mekânda biçimlenişi [The concept of sustainability and its formation in space]. Yalvaç Akademi Dergisi, 4(1), 41-55.

Bayat, F., & Küçükali, U. F. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında yeşil binaların ulusal ve uluslararası örnekler üzerinden incelenmesi. Anadolu Bil Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 16(64), 321-347.

Belek, A. N., & Yamaçlı, R. (2023). Ekolojik binaların sürdürülebilir tasarım kriterleri ve değerlendirme süreci. Mimarlık ve Yaşam, 8(2), 529-550. https://doi.org/10.26835/my.1219441

Bozlağan, R. (2010). Sürdürülebilir gelişme düşüncesinin tarihsel arka planı. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 50, 1011-1028.

BREEAM. (2026). Explore BREEAM: Maps [Database]. Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://tools.breeam.com/projects/explore/map.jsp?sectionid=0&projectType=&rating=&certNo=&buildingName=&client=&developer=&certBody=&assessor=&addressPostcode=&countryId=7&partid=10023&Submit=Search

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Akademi.

Büyükünsal, A., & Alıcı, O. (2023). Türkiye’deki yeşil bina sertifikasyon süreci ve anket uygulaması. Uluslararası Sürdürülebilir Mühendislik ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 7(2), 177-187.

Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296_312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975696

Cohen, M. (2017). A systematic review of urban sustainability assessment literature. Sustainability, 9(11), Article 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112048

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Çevre Dostu Yeşil Binalar Derneği. (2026). Yeşil bina veri tabanı: Sertifikalı binalar [Database]. Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://www.cedbik.org/items

Çillioğlu-Karademir, A., & Dağ, A. (2021). Sürdürülebilirlik uygulaması olarak yeşil bina ve LEED sertifikasyonu üzerine Türkiye’de inşaat sektöründe bir çalışma. Akademia Doğa ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 63-83.

Darko, A., & Chan, A. P. C. (2016). A critical analysis of green building research trends in construction journals. Habitat International, 57, 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.001

Darko, A., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Review of barriers to green building adoption. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1651

Deligöz, D., Kabak, S., & Sağlam, A. İ. (2020). Türkiye’de konut yapılarında kullanılmakta olan sertifika sistemlerinin kaynakların korunumu bağlamında incelenmesi. GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi, 3(2), 222-245. https://doi.org/10.37246/grid.743045

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen. (2026). DGNB building project directory [Database]. April 23, 2026, from https://www.dgnb.de/en

Dharmarathna, D., Graham, P., & Bunster, V. (2025). Unpacking the evolution of Green Star rating tools and their certification trends in Australian building projects. Journal of Building Engineering, 111, Article 113328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113328

Dilfiruz, B., & Sevinç, İ. (2025). Sürdürülebilirliği anlamak ve kentlerle bağını kurmak. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 34(2), 147-180.

Doan, D. T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Zhang, T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Tookey, J. (2017). A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 123, 243_260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007

Du-Pisani, J. A. (2006). Sustainable development: Historical roots of the concept. Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831

Dwaikat, L. N., & Ali, K. N. (2016). Green buildings cost premium: A review of empirical evidence. Energy and Buildings, 110, 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.021

Ebert, T., Eßig, N., & Hauser, G. (2012). Green building certification systems: Assessing sustainability –International system comparison – Economic impact of certifications. DETAIL Green Books.

Edwards, B. (2010). Rough guide to sustainability: A design primer (3rd ed.). RIBA Publishing.

Erdede, S. B., & Bektaş, S. (2014). Ekolojik açıdan sürdürülebilir taşınmaz geliştirme ve yeşil bina sertifika sistemleri. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 1-12.

Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies. (2026). EDGE building project directory [Database]. April 23, 2026, from https://edgebuildings.com/project-studies/greenox-residence/

Feijão, D., Reis, C., & Marques, M. C. (2024). Comparative analysis of sustainable building certification processes. Journal of Building Engineering, 96, Article 110401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110401

Geçimli, M. (2021). Sürdürülebilir tasarımda yeşil bina sertifikasyon sistemlerinin karşılaştırmalı analizi: BEST-DGNB. Online Journal of Art and Design, 9(4), 28-37.

Gedik, Y. (2020). Sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel boyutlarla sürdürülebilirlik ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 196-215.

Hashi, M. N., & Kasapoğlu, E. (2023). Türkiye’de LEED belgesi almış büro binalarının sürdürülebilir malzeme ve kaynak kullanımı bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Eksen Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 170-188. https://doi.org/10.58317/eksen.1161249

Healey, J. (2014). Statistics: A tool for social research. Cengage Learning.

Hill, R. C., & Bowen, P. A. (1997). Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment. Construction Management and Economics, 15(3), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372971

Hiltown Karşıyaka. (2026). BREEAM Certificate. April 28, 2026, https://hilltownkarsiyaka.com/tr/hakkimizda

Isimbi, D., & Park, J. (2022). The analysis of the EDGE certification system on residential complexes to improve sustainabilit and affordability. Buildings, 12(10), Article 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101729

Izmir Metropolitan Municipality. (2020a). Izmir green city action plan (GCAP).

Izmir Metropolitan Municipality. (2020b). Izmir sustainable energy and climate action plan (SECAP).

Jenks, M., & Jones, C. (Eds.). (2010). Dimensions of the sustainable city. Springer.

Karaer, R., & Kömürlü, R. (2025). Türkiye’deki LEED Gold sertifikası almış otel yapılarının karşılaştırılmalı analizi. Kent Akademisi, 18(6), 3592-3611. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1667648

Karimi, H., Adibhesami, M. A., Bazazzadeh, H., & Movafagh, S. (2023). Green buildings: Human-centred and energy efficiency optimisation strategies. Energies, 16(9), Article 3681. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093681

Kaya, H. E., & Taylan-Susan, A. (2020). Sürdürülebilir bir kentleşme yaklaşımı olarak, ekolojik planlama ve eko-kentler. İDEALKENT, 11(30), 909-937. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.533730

Keleş, R. (1990). Kentleşme politikası [Urbanisation policy]. İmge Kitabevi.

Khan, J. S., Zakaria, R., Shamsudin, S. M., Abidin, N. I. A., Sahamir, S. R., Abbas, D. N., & Aminudin, E. (2019). Evolution to emergence of green buildings: A review. Administrative Sciences, 9(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9010006

Kibert, C. J. (2022). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Korur, Z. N. (2024). Mimarlıkta sürdürülebilirliğin öneminin yeniden yorumlanması. Kent Akademisi, 17(5), 2081-2102. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1434768

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Kubba, S. (2017). Handbook of green building design and construction: LEED, BREEAM, and Green Globes (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.

Lélé, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P

Li, Y., Rong, Y., Ahmad, U. M., Wang, X., Zuo, J., & Mao, G. (2021). A comprehensive review on green buildings research: Bibliometric analysis during 1998–2018. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 46196-46214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12739-7

McLennan, J. F. (2004). The philosophy of sustainable design: The future of architecture. Ecotone.

Mebratu, D. (1998). Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review. Environ-mental Impact Assessment Review, 18(6), 493-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5

Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press.

Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5

Rönesans Holding. (2024, July 29). BREEAM In_Use Certificate. https://ronesans.com/haberler/izmir_optimum-breeam-in-use-sertifikasi-ni-olaganustu-duzeyde-kazandi

Sánchez-Cordero, A., Gómez Melgar, S., & Andújar-Márquez, J. M. (2020). Green building rating systems and the new framework Level(s): A critical review of sustainability certification within Europe. Energies, 13(1), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010066

Sassi, P. (2006). Strategies for sustainable architecture. Taylor & Francis.

Sev, A. (2009). Sürdürülebilir mimarlık [Sustainable architecture]. YEM Yayın.

Shan, M., & Hwang, B.-G. (2018). Green building rating systems: Global reviews of practices and research efforts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.034

Sığrı, Ü. (2021). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods]. Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.

Uruk, Z. F., & Külünkoğlu-Islamoğlu, A. K. (2019). BREEAM, LEED ve DGNB yeşil bina sertifikasyon sistemlerinin standart bir konutta karşılaştırılması. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 15, 143_154. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.512291

U.S. Green Building Council. (2026). LEED project directory [Database]. Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://www.usgbc.org/projects

Wei, W., Ramalho, O., & Mandin, C. (2015). Indoor air quality requirements in green building certifications. Building and Environment, 92, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.035

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yudelson, J. (2009). Green building through integrated design. McGraw-Hill.

Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z.-Y. (2014). Green building research – Current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.021

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026)

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Duygu Gökce, Onur Tos, Harika Tos

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Gökce, D., Tos, O., & Tos, H. (2026). Green building certification systems: An assessment of the city of Izmir. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 7(2), 284-307. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2026.v7i2215

Similar Articles

61-70 of 136

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.