Optimizing design thinking process for group housing through interaction design methods

Samantha Kumar Tadiboina; Ramesh Srikonda

doi:10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i2166

Optimizing design thinking process for group housing through interaction design methods

Authors

Samantha Kumar Tadiboina Short Bio School of Planning and Architecture, Vijayawada

Tadiboina Samantha Kumar is a doctoral research scholar and assistant professor in Department of Architecture at the School of Planning and Architecture, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Architecture from Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture and Fine Arts University, Hyderabad, and a Master’s in Environmental Architecture from the Anna University, Chennai. He began his academic career as an Assistant Professor at the National Institute of Design, Andhra Pradesh, before pursuing his PhD. His current research focuses on optimizing the design thinking process for group housing through interaction design methods, with a broader interest in participatory design, sustainable housing models, and community engagement practices. He has contributed to design innovation projects, user-centered housing studies, and government-supported design research initiatives, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach towards housing design and policy development.
Ramesh Srikonda Short Bio School of Planning and Architecture

Prof. Dr. Ramesh Srikonda is a senior academic and administrator currently serving as the Director and Professor at the School of Planning and Architecture, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. He has over 25 years of professional experience in urban planning, housing design, and architectural education. His academic journey includes a Bachelor’s in Architecture and Master’s degree in Planning and PhD from IIT Delhi. Prof. Srikonda has guided several doctoral scholars, authored research papers on affordable housing, sustainable urban development, and design pedagogy, and actively contributes to policy discussions on housing resilience and inclusivity. His research interests include community-driven housing strategies, participatory planning, and application of design thinking in large-scale housing developments.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i2166

Keywords:

interaction design, design thinking, group housing, user-centered design, spatial innovation

Abstract

This research paper investigates the optimization of the Design Thinking (DT) process for group housing projects by using Interaction Design (IxD) methods. Group housing design is increasingly complicated as it attempts to balance individual requirements, community behavior, and sustainability. Through the integration of Design Thinking principles—empathy, ideation, prototyping, and iteration. This article proposes a hybrid approach that combines Interaction Design (IxD) methods, including empathy mapping, interactive prototyping, and real-time feedback systems, to optimize DT's phases (empathize, ideate, prototype, test) in group housing. Through a series of case studies, the research shows how IxD's focus on dynamic user interactions and iterative co-design increases participatory outcomes. Key outcomes are a 30% increase in resident satisfaction with communal spaces, a 25% decrease in design iteration cycles, and enhanced conflict resolution in shared spaces through means such as behavioral analytics and VR-based spatial simulations. The framework not only closes gaps in DT's usage but also encourages interdisciplinary collaboration, allowing architects and interaction designers to co-create flexible, user-oriented living spaces. Practical considerations for large-scale housing solutions are debated, including limitations to cultural responsiveness and resources needed. Recommendations are provided to bring digital-physical feedback tools into policy and practice at the end of the study, which is a path for future work across different socio-spatial environments.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Akinsulire, A. A., Idemudia, C., Okwandu, A. C., & Iwuanyanwu, O. (2024). Sustainable development in affordable housing: Policy innovations and challenges. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 11(2), 90-104. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0112
Bilandzic, M., Foth, M., & De Luca, A. (2008). CityFlocks: Designing social navigation for urban mobile information systems. DIS '08: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Cape Town. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394464
Blair, T., & Minkler, M. (2009). Participatory action research with older adults: Key principles in practice. The Gerontologist, 49(5), 651-662. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp049
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 12(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
Caramiaux, B., Altavilla, A., Pobiner, S. G., & Tanaka, A. (2015). Form follows sound: Designing interactions from sonic memories. CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702515
Darmawan, I., Anwar, M. S., Rahmatulloh, A., & Sulastri, H. (2022). Design thinking approach for user interface design and user experience on campus academic information systems. International Journal On Informatics Visualization, 6(2), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.6.2.997
Datta, A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: 'Entrepreneurial urbanization' in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565748
Deluca, S., & Rosenblatt, P. (2010). Does moving to better neighborhoods lead to better schooling opportunities? Parental school choice in an experimental housing voucher program. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1443-1491. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200504
Díaz, P., & Aedo, I. (2020). Combining software engineering and design thinking practices in augmented digital experiences. Interacting with Computers, 32(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwaa020
Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068
Elsbach, K. D., & Stigliani, I. (2018). Design thinking and organizational culture: A review and framework for future research. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2274-2306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744252
Elwood, S. (2009). Integrating participatory action research and GIS education: Negotiating methodologies, politics and technologies. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276565
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Haryuda, D., Asfi, M., & Fahrudin, R. (2021). Perancangan UI/UX menggunakan metode design thinking berbasis web pada Laportea Company. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informası Terapan, 8(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.33197/jitter.vol8.iss1.2021.730
Hays, D. G., & Singh, A. A. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. The Guilford Press, New York. https://doi.org/None
Häggman, A., Honda, T., & Yang, M. C. (2013). The influence of timing in exploratory prototyping and other activities in design projects. Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 5: 25th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; ASME 2013 Power Transmission and Gearing Conference. Portland, Oregon, USA. August 4-7, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-12700
Herring, C., Yarbrough, D., & Alatorre, L. M. (2019). Pervasive penality: How the criminalization of poverty perpetuates homelessness. Social Problems, 67(1), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spz004
Hou, I.-C., Lan, M.-F., Shen, S.-H., Tsai, P. Y., Chang, K. J., Tai, H.-C., Tsai, A.-J., Chang, P., Wang, T.-F., Sheu, S.-J., & Dykes, P. C. (2019). The development of a mobile health app for breast cancer self-management support in Taiwan: Design thinking approach. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/15780
Kapilashrami, A., & Marsden, S. (2018). Examining intersectional inequalities in access to health (enabling) resources in disadvantaged communities in Scotland: Advancing the participatory paradigm. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0797-x
Kappel, S., Hawkins, P., & Mendl, M. T. (2017). To group or not to group? Good practice for housing male laboratory mice. Animals, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7120088
Karnawan, G. (2021). Implementasi user experience menggunakan metode design thinking pada prototype aplikasi Cleanstic. Jurnal Teknoinfo, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.33365/jti.v15i1.540
Lucchi, E., & Delera, A. C. (2020). Enhancing the historic public social housing through a user-centered design-driven approach. Buildings, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10090159
Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J. S., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2018). Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466
Nasution, W. S. L., & Nusa, P. (2021). UI/UX design web-based learning application using design thinking method. ARRUS Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.35877/jetech532
Park, H.-S., Lee, D., Kim, S., & Kim, J.-L. (2015). Comparing project performance of design-build and design-bid-build methods for large-sized public apartment housing projects in Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 14(2), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.323
Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2008). Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 14, 131-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8
Sandelowski, M. (2013). Unmixing mixed-methods research. Research in Nursing and Health, 37(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21570
Srisombut, T., Thamlersak, S., Chaitantipong, P., & Siriborvornratanakul, T. (2021). Design thinking approach for the development of theme park application. Augmented Human Research, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-021-00054-2
Tabroni, I., & Purnamasari, R. (2022). Kajian yasinan mingguan dalam membina karakter masyarakat pada masa COVID-19 di Perumahan Lebak Kinasih Purwakarta. Sivitas : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 2(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.52593/svs.02.1.02
UN-Habitat. (2022). Envisaging the Future of Cities. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf
Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. S. (2011). The meaning of "aging in place" to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098

Downloads

PDF

0

2

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Tadiboina, S. K., & Srikonda, R. (2025). Optimizing design thinking process for group housing through interaction design methods. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 6(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i2166