Analysing morphogenetic design approaches in the context of hypothetical housing examples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i1162Keywords:
embryological house, fab tree hab, molecular house, morphogenetic design, multistory apartmentAbstract
Conceptual approaches that systematically integrate ecological reasoning with algorithmic design processes have gained increasing attention in theoretical discussions on architectural practice. However, a significant gap remains in terms of their application, particularly within the context of housing architecture. In response to this theoretical gap, this study aims to evaluate the algorithmic orientations of designers who transform their spatial inquiries into an ecological organization through hypothetical housing examples. This evaluation is framed through the concept of morphogenetic design—a biologically informed architectural approach in which form and space evolve not through predetermined templates but through generative, adaptive, and systemic processes. Accordingly, the study addresses two main research questions: 'The potential impact of morphogenetic design on residential buildings' and 'Integration of morphogenetic design into housing construction processes'. The study employed a qualitative research design and the literature review method to answer the research questions. The research sample consists of four hypothetical housing projects: Embryological House, Multistory Apartment Building, Molecular Engineered House, and The Fab Tree Hab. These projects were developed using morphogenetic design approaches in 2000 and beyond. In order to collect data from the main mass in an easy and fast way, Homogeneous sampling method, one of the purposeful sampling types, was preferred. In this context, the 'descriptive content analysis method' was preferred to analyse the data obtained in the research and the data was analysed in two stages. In the first stage, descriptive analysis was carried out and the general trend was determined by examining the qualitative studies that could answer the research questions. In the second stage, content analysis was carried out and the data obtained were organised and interpreted according to the parameters set by the researcher. The analysis indicates that morphogenetic design has the capacity to substantially transform the formal, functional and ecological dimensions of future residential buildings. Digital design methods, biologically inspired production techniques and user-participatory design strategies have rendered it feasible for buildings to self-renew, establish symbiotic relationships with their environment and adapt to various living scenarios. This process is characterised by the integration of sustainability and user experience across multiple stages, ranging from design to construction.
Metrics
References
- Akbulut, D. (2009). The method of evolutionary design and creativity within the process. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 1(2), 21-33.
- Akyol Altun, D. (2007). Architecture of future: The effects of scientific-technological transformations on architecture. Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Engineering Journal of Science and Engineering, 9(1), 77-91.
- Arbona, J., Greden, L., & Joachim, M. (2003). Nature's technology: The fab tree hab house. Thresholds, 26, 48-53.
- Armstrong, R. (2015). Vibrant architecture: Matter as a codesigner of living structures. De Gruyter Open.
- Aziz, M. S., & El Sherif, A. Y. (2016). Biomimicry as an approach for bio-inspired structure with the aid of computation. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 1(55), 707-714.
- Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. Quill.
- Bhushan, B. (2009). Biomimetics: Lessons from nature-an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367(1893), 1445-1486.
- Bulu, A., & Kavut, İ. E. (2021). Research on morphogenesis effects in fictional spaces. Architecture and Life, 6(3). 831-844.
- CCA. (n.d.). Greg Lynn's embryological house: Case study in the preservation of digital architecture. Docam. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from https://www.docam.ca/conservation/embryological-house/index.html
- Collingwood, R. G. (1945). The idea of nature. The Clarendon Press.
- DeLanda, M. (2013). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- De Pauw, I. C., Karana, E., Kandachar, P., & Poppelaars, F. (2014). Comparing biomimicry and cradle to cradle with ecodesign: A case study of student design projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 78, 174-183.
- Elibol, G. C., Türkkan, V. D., & Bezci, İ. (2021). Biologically inspired design: A case study on furniture design experiences of interior architecture students. Gazi University Journal of Science Part C: Design and Technology, 9(4), 679-689.
- El-Zeiny, R. M. A. (2012). Biomimicry as a problem solving methodology in interior architecture. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 502-512.
- Erbaş Korur, Z. N., & Dülgeroğlu Yüksel, Y. (2013). Effects of genetic science on architecture discipline. Beykent University Journal of Science and Engineering, 6(1), 11-25.
- Eryılmaz, H. (2015). Biomimicry and ergonomics: Innovative inspiration from nature for design. Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 3(3), 469-474.
- Frazer, J. (1995). An evolutionary architecture. AA Publication.
- Glform. (2008, October 21). Embryological house [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59wFguSjorA
- Gruber, P. (2010). Biomimetics in architecture: Architecture of life and buildings. Springer.
- Helms, M., Vattam, S. S., & Goel, A. K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: Process and products. Design studies, 30(5), 606-622.
- Hensel, M., Menges, A., & Weinstock, M. (2004). Emergence: Morphogenetic design strategies. Wiley.
- Hensel, M., Menges, A., & Weinstock, M. (2013). Emergent technologies and design: Towards a biological paradigm for architecture. Routledge.
- İnceköse, Ü. (2008). Çağdaş mimarlık söylemleri ve doğabilimsel bilgi: “Yeni” mimarlık için “yeni”den bilimsel kavramlar. Mimarlık, 341, 32-34.
- Johansen, J. M. (2002). Nanoarchitecture: A new species of architecture. Princeton Architectural Press.
- Keller, S. (2012). Beauty, genius, epigenesis: The Kantian origins of contemporary architecture. Journal of Architectural Education, 65(2), 42-51.
- Kennedy, E. B. (2017). Biomimicry: Design by analogy to biology. Research Technology Management, 60(6), 51-55.
- Kolarevic, B. (2000). Digital morphogenesis and computational architectures. Sigradi, 1-6.
- Kolarevic, B., & Malkawi, A. (2005). Performative architecture: Beyond instrumentality. Routledge.
- Lynn, G. (1999). Animate form. Princeton Architectural Press.
- Lynn, G. (2000). Embryologic houses. Architectural Design, 70(3), 26-35.
- Maglic, M. J. (2021). Biomimicry: Using nature as a model for design. [Master’s thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst] UMASS AMHERST.
- Menges, A. (2012). Biomimetic design processes in architecture: Morphogenetic and evolutionary computational design. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 7(1), 015003.
- Mitchell, W. J. (1996). City of bits: Space, place, and the infobahn. MIT Press.
- Özer Yaman, G. (2022). Güncel tasarım yaklaşımlarının mimarlık eğitim sürecine katkılarının deneyimlenmesi. In A. Çabuk & H. S. Aşıkkutlu (Eds.), Mimarlık, Planlama ve Tasarım Alanında Yeni Trendler (pp. 200-228). Duvar Yayınları.
- Picon, A. (2010). Digital culture in architecture: An introduction for the design professions. Birkhäuser.
- Portoghesi, P. (2000). Nature and architecture. Skira Press.
- Reiser, J., & Umemoto, N. (2006). Atlas of novel tectonics. Princeton Architectural Press.
- Riley, T. (1999). The un-private house. The Museum of Modern Art.
- Roudavski, S. (2009). Towards morphogenesis in architecture. International journal of architectural computing, 7(3), 345-374.
- Volstad, N. L., & Boks, C. (2012). On the use of biomimicry as a useful tool for the industrial designer. Sustainable Development, 20(3), 189-199.
- Von Sydow, M. (2012). From Darwinian metaphysics towards understanding the evolution of evolutionary mechanisms. Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
- Vural, S., & Mutlu Avinç, G. (2015). Doğadan esinli geleneksel ve sayısal tasarım yöntemlerinin yaşam kriterlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. In S. Yazıcı, C. Akoğlu, A. Özbil Torun, I. Tekçe & C. Bayazıtoğlu (Eds.), IX. Mimarlıkta Sayısal Tasarım Ulusal Sempozyumu (MSTAS 2015) Bildiri Kitabı (pp. 25-26). Istanbul/Türkiye.
- Zari, M. P. (2007). Biomimetic approaches to architectural design for increased sustainability. Sustainable Building, Regional Sustainable Building Conference, Auckland/New Zealand.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anday Türkmen
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.